Skip to content
Washington ACEP
|
waacep@washingtonacep.org
Facebook
Twitter
Search for:
Home
About Us/Bylaws
Archives
Committees
Anti-Racism and Health Justice
Education Committee
Legislative Affairs Committee
Communications Committee
Wellness Committee
Guardian of Emergency Medicine Award
Leadership
Membership
Nancy Auer Meritorious Achievement Award
Strategic Plan 2021-24
Calendar of Events
Annual Meeting
Calendar of Events
Emergency Medicine Leadership Summit
Resources
Balanced Billing – Guide to Arbitration
COVID-19 Information and Resources
MAT in the ED
Seven Best Practice Resources
ED Directors
Journal Club
JobsWatch – Career Opportunities
Newsletter
Practice Resources
Helpful Links
Advocacy
Advocacy
Emergency Action Fund
Political Action Committee
Contact Us
Search for:
2022 Leadership Summit CME Evaluation
Cailey Nickerson
2022-10-31T17:55:55+00:00
2022 Leadership Summit CME Evaluation
Name
(Required)
First
Last
Date
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Email
(Required)
Please select your credentials
(Required)
MD
DO
DNP
ARNP
PA
RN
LPM
Student
EMS
Other
Was it disclosed whether or not each individual in control of content had conflicts of interest with ACCME defined commercial interests was provided in advance of my participation in the accredited education?
(Required)
Yes
No
Was it disclosed whether or not there was commercial support received from ACCME defined commercial interests was provided in advance of my participation in the accredited education?
(Required)
Yes
No
The learning objectives were actionable and measurable and supported by the activity content.
(Required)
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
The activity format was appropriate for the setting and relevant to my practice.
(Required)
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
The activity content was fair balanced, free of bias, and used generic names for drugs or equipment or reflected trade names from several companies.
(Required)
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Patient treatment recommendations were evidence-based, appropriate for audience, and will contribute to overall improvements in care.
(Required)
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Scientific studies cited within the activity conform to standards acceptable by the scientific community.
(Required)
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Are there any issues you would like to raise regarding the activity content?
(Required)
Yes
No
If yes, please provide specific details. (open text field)
Will you make changes in your practice because of your participation in the activity?
(Required)
Yes
No
If yes, please describe specific changes you have or plan to make. (open text field)
Please rate the following talks:
N/A- did not attend
Unsatisfactory
Average
Exemplary
Workplace Violence in the ED - Madeline Majsterek, Annie Chipman, and Dana Cashman; moderated by Jessica Wall
Census and Boarding: ED Overcrowding and the Coming Apocalypse - Renee Hisa (virtual participation), Cassie Sauer, and Steve Mitchell; moderated by Herbie Duber
Legislative Update - Sean Graham and Susie Tracey
Bias Training Slide Intro - Sarah Hansen
What would you like to hear more of?
What would you like to hear less of?
Please rank the SeaTac Conference Center
Poor
Average
Good
Parking
Convention Center was easy to find
Food
Audio/Visual
Meeting room temperature
Meeting room setup
Other thoughts:
Page load link
Go to Top